Let’s play a little game of ‘what if.’
I read two different articles on how two different approaches Covid could have vastly effected outcomes. What if instead of what those “who knew best” dictated and mandated that we do, each of us had the ability to choose which direction we, as individuals, wanted to go.
As those who have read my opinions in the past are aware, from the beginning I was a big proponent of using Ivermectin to treat Covid. In fact, in order to put my money where my mouth was, in November, 2023, I used Ivermectin to treat my second bout of Covid. My response to my early use of Ivermectin in November was akin to miraculous. Using myself as a Covid control, as my initial Covid was years ago, there was no comparison as to how I responded to my early use of Ivermectin.
What if, instead of basically banning the use of Ivermectin, Ivermectin was readily available, and we had all been free to choose our individual approaches to Covid ?
What if the US had paid more attention to Brazil?
From the Epoch Times, 3/28/24:
“A large-scale prospective clinical observational study in Brazil that included 159,561 residents found that administering ivermectin at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg for two consecutive days every 15 days significantly reduced infection, mortality, and hospitalization during the Omicron epidemic period. The study showed that treatment with ivermectin was associated with a decrease of 44 percent, 68 percent, and 56 percent in infection, mortality, and hospitalization rates, respectively, as compared to the non-treatment control group.
Another analysis of the same study setting, based on 88,012 subjects, showed that regular use of ivermectin for 150 days was linked with an even greater effect on COVID-19, reducing the infection, mortality, and hospitalization rates by 49 percent, 92 percent, and 100 percent, compared to non-users.”
Wow! Pretty impressive! Just sayin’!
The second thing that I just read is from the Washington Times via Jeff Childers Coffee and Covid:
• In 2021, colorectal cancer suddenly shot from fourth place to the
leading cause of cancer death in men under 50. It leapt to second
place in women.
- Young adult oral and liver cancer deaths spiked since 2021. So did deadly cervical tumors in women ages 30 through 44, which tellingly reversed “decades of decline” — not a long, slow increase as corporate media would have you believe. It’s the exact opposite.
- According to the CDC’s heavily manipulated data, between pre-pandemic 2019 and 2023, across all ages, cancer deaths rose by +2%. And in young people aged 15 to 44 years, cancer mortality rose twice as fast, to +4%.
- Some cancers had mortality increases far exceeding +2% and +4%. Deaths from the aforementioned colorectal cancer rose +17% in the 15-to-44 group, four times the population-wide increase.
- Uterine cancer deaths shot up +37% among 25-to-44-year-olds between 2019 and 2023; they rose +15% overall (all ages).
- Whatever they want to call it, more and more oncologists are seeing what we would call ‘turbo cancer.’ The Times’ article quoted William Dahut, the American Cancer Society’s chief scientific officer, who said “Colorectal cancers are presenting with more aggressive disease and larger tumors at diagnosis, which is more difficult to treat.”
To me this certainly is an impressive array of increases in the incidence of many different types of cancer, especially considering that there had been a recent impressive decrease up till 2019.
Although not yet proven, if this cancer increase turns out to be due to the Covid vaccine, then Ivermectin use would look even better. … “What if ?”
4/4/24