There is now a new term that has come into our lexicon … “malinformation .” To help understand this new term one has to understand some other related terms.
From the Washington Examiner, July 20, 2023:
“Malinformation is info that is true but inconvenient to the government, that they don’t want people to hear,” RFKJr said.
The term stands in contrast with misinformation and disinformation, which both involve the spreading of false information as truth. Misinformation is generally regarded as falsehoods that are disseminated without a specific intent to mislead, while disinformation is defined as falsehoods spread intentionally.
Why bring up something that JFKJr said over a year ago at
his testimony before the House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government?
Just recently JFKJR. was on a Tucker Carlson podcast.
“I lost my Instagram account; I had almost a million followers. They say it was for ‘misinformation,’ but they could not point to a single post that I ever made that was factually erroneous,” RFK explains.
In emails, Facebook was recorded pushing back and saying RFK wasn’t factually incorrect, so they had to come up with a new word for what RFK was doing.
“Malinformation, which is information that is factually true but nevertheless inconvenient for the government,” RFKJr says, to which Tucker responds, “That’s illegal.”
Some may think that he government would never do anything “illegal,” but after watching Tulsi Gabbard’s video describing what has recently happened to her and her husband because of what she said on a TV interview, perhaps we should all reconsider our faith in our government! Was what was done to Tulsi Gabbard a form of revenge, or merely a warning to others about what can happen if you express your opinion?
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/09/you_must_watch_tulsi_gabbard_s_video_about_the_harris_biden_administration_s_stasi_style_governance.html
Just the other day an undercover video from CV NEWS FEED // A spokesman for a Department of Justice (DOJ) office, Nicholas Biase stated in an undercover video that Democratic New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of former President Donald Trump is “nonsense” and a politically motivated effort at the behest of “the Democrats.”
In addition, Nicholas Biase acknowledged that Bragg’s prosecution – which resulted in Trump’s May 30 conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records – is backfiring on Democrats.
The prosecution is “a perversion of justice,” Biase continued. “[Bragg] was stacking charges and rearranging things just to make it fit a case. No, to be honest with you, I think the case is nonsense.”
Biase went on to say that Bragg is “probably going to try to lock [Trump] up.”
“They’re so obsessed with getting him,” Biase continued.
“Who is they?” the journalist asked.
“The Democrats,” Biase replied. He explained that he has personally known Bragg, who used to work in his office, for 15 years.
The spokesman implied that Bragg, his “very ambitious” former colleague, may have decided to prosecute Trump to increase his name recognition and pave the way for a potential future bid for higher office, such as New York City mayor.
When the journalist asked Biase about the ongoing Georgia election interference case against Trump, he called it “a travesty of justice.”
“To put it mildly, it’s a mockery of justice,” he continued, calling Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis “a joke.”
“The whole thing is disgusting,” he added. “They’re just out to get him.”
9/9/24
californiacontrarian