I saw an interesting world map recently. Although I have always been interested in geography, this world map had a twist. It was a world map which was color-coded for the incidence per 100K population of cancer rates in those less than fifty. Granted that while many different variables might affect this rate in different parts of the world, I was struck by a few things on this map (see below).
First: look at the extremely high incidence of cancer in those less than fifty in Australia and New Zealand, followed by the high incidence in the U.S., France, Italy and Portugal.
Second: look at the low incidence in most of central Africa as well as a few countries in Central America.
In a similar but not identical light … from People:
“North Carolina State University (NCSU) has launched an investigation after elevated levels of cancer-causing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were detected in a campus building.
The investigation has now led to numerous alumni reporting health conditions that they claim may be linked to Poe Hall.
Over 150 people have reported cases of cancer or other serious illnesses to WRAL in Raleigh, North Carolina. The local outlet has been collecting health data from current and former students and employees since the university’s investigation was launched.
These cases have not been officially linked to Poe Hall and cannot be considered a “cancer cluster,” which is “the occurrence of a greater than expected number of cancer cases among a group of people in a defined geographic area over a specific time period,” according to the National Cancer Institute.”
Here we have two completely different situations, each with a statistical grouping that seems to be outside of random. Now while there is no proof for what I am going to say, these two separate unrelated situations got me thinking … “could either one or both of these statistical anomalies be be related to the Covid vaccine?”
The expected response to my query would be that since the Covid vaccines were used throughout the world, the vaccine cannot be responsible for the difference in young cancer rates per 100K population in adjacent countries … e.g. between the US and Mexico.
To that I would answer that despite the fact that San DIego and Tijuana are within a few miles of each other, the batches of vaccine used in these areas were not from the same distributor. Those batches used in the US were from a federal distributor while those batches used in Mexico were from a totally different distributor. Could it be that not all batches of vaccine are the same, especially when side effects are concerned?
Similarly, although at this point, PCBs seem to be the leading suspected cause for these alarming cancer stats in younger individuals who attended NCSU, to me it seems unusual that this increased incidence is just now showing up over forty years after Poe Hall was built. Is it likely or unlikely that these NCSU students were all vaccinated from the same batch of vaccine?
Hmmm!
5/13/24