A day after the election my liberal neighbor asked me if I was happy with the result. He is aware that I am a big Trump backer, but instead of a snarky answer, I replied, “I am happy for America.”
The puzzled look on his face prompted me to continue, “Specifically, I am happy for those struggling economically, as now at least they will have a chance to make ends meet. Likewise I am happy for those who have to drive many many miles back and forth to work, as at least they can look forward to lower gas prices in the future. I am happy for those who will soon be able to buy their first house as dropping interest rates will lead to lower future mortgage payments.
“Furthermore, I am happy that your daughter and my granddaughters can feel safer as President Trump rids the country of young illegal men who prey on innocent girls and women. In addition, I am happy that soon girls and women will not have to put up with men in their locker rooms and bathrooms, and that only real genetic women will be playing in women’s sports.
“Yes, I am happy, and you should be too.”
11/7/24
To Reiterate
I think that yesterday’s election was basically decided because Kamala Harris was a lousy candidate, and Trump took advantage of it. Trump took positions on a myriad of things, whereas Harris was the opposite … not taking positions on things she has supported in the past, such as; providing reparations to black Americans; “sanctuary cities”; the restoration of voting rights for all former prison inmates; welcoming multitudes of foreign nationals supposedly displaced by “climate change” to flood into the U.S.; providing taxpayer-funded sex-change mutilations to illegal aliens; ending the detention of illegal aliens; massive restrictions on drilling for oil; giving millions of illegal aliens smuggled into the country a pathway to citizenship; ending the death penalty; forcing automakers to cease building gas-burning vehicles by 2035; decriminalizing prostitution; closing private, for-profit prisons; and abolishing the Senate filibuster.
The Democrats have only themselves to blame for their shellacking, as it was they who covered for Biden’s obvious mental decline, and then arbitrarily anointed Harris as their candidate even though she was not likable and had not ever garnered any votes nationally.
To be honest Harris was put in the unenviable position of trying to reverse the feelings of many Americans concerning the future of our country. Prior to yesterday’s election according to CNN, only 28% of Americans believed the country was headed in the right direction. Gallup’s version was even more dismal at 26%. That was a startlingly low number, especially given its historical precedent.
What do the Democrats do now? To use a sport’s analogy … their staring pitcher (Joe Biden) was knocked out of the game early, and they were forced to use a substandard long-reliever (Kamala Harris) who had never pitched in the big leagues before. Consequently the Dems were trounced. Moreover, to make matters worse for the future, they have no relievers in the bullpen and no good prospects in the minors … they have no one ready to step up and be a starting pitcher before the election in four years … Good! Serves them right !
11/6/24
To Reiterate
As I am sure you realize today is the official Election Day even though voting has been going on for quite a while in multiple locales. Thus it is possible that the election has basically already been decided.
For many months I have predicted a Trump victory, and some have asked why I have felt so strongly.
Some recent events obviously did not color my opinion months back. The latest news about jobs (in October there were just 12,000 new jobs, below the consensus estimate of 113,000) was inconsequential because the American people know that many cannot find a job.
I think that the Trump endorsements by Megyn Kelly, Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, and RFKJr had only a minimal effect. Likewise, I do not think that the “garbage” comment by Joe Biden had much of an effect.
Similarly,my opinion does not involve the betting sites, (Polymarket now favors Trump 60-40). Months back when I predicted a Trump victory the betting odds were close to even money.
Likewise my opinion did not involve polling, as back when I first predicted a Trump victory, the polling results showed that the race was close to even, and now every day it seems that different polling numbers are coming out.
To reiterate, for months I have been saying that Trump will be our next President. My prediction of a Trump victory was based on my betting on the judgement, pertinacity, and knowledge of the American electorate. Despite what the mainstream media was preaching, I was betting on the American people.
11/5/24
The Day Before the Election
For a long time I have been paying attention to the Nazi-like tactics of some law enforcement officials who come to a person’s home with guns drawn. In a number of these situations a knock on the door or a letter in the mail could have been used instead, but, no. The latest outrageous over-the-top incident occurred on 10/30/24 in upstate New York to Mark Longo and his wife Christy. What did this couple do to warrant a convoy of vehicles and ten government agents to invade his home?
Did Mark Longo pray silently somewhere that he wasn’t supposed to?
Did Mark Longo push a bully who was verbally abusing his son in front of an abortion clinic?
Apparently Mark Longo did something far worse! He was keeping a pet squirrel in his house, and the proper paperwork, although started, had not yet been completed!
Some Karen, possibly Monica Keasler, complained to authorities and subsequently allegedly bragged about it. (I say ‘allegedly’ because Monica Keasler’s Facebook page has been taken down.)
The judge, Richard Rich, who signed the warrant that led to Mark Longo’s house being invaded by the gestapo was an independent until 2013 when he became a Democrat.
From Townhall:
“An upstate man whose beloved squirrel, Peanut, was cruelly killed by the state said he was treated like a “terrorist” when 10 government agents descended on his home during a five-hour raid.
Mark Longo, whose pet P’nut captured the hearts of 3 million social media users, was stunned when a convoy of vehicles carrying officials from the state departments of Environmental Conservation and Health arrived at his Pine City home.
“They treated me like I was a terrorist. They treated this raid as if I was a drug dealer. They ransacked my house for five hours,” Longo told The Post Saturday.
“They asked my wife, who is of German descent, what her immigration status was. They asked if I had cameras in my house. They wouldn’t allow me to go to the bathroom without a police escort, who then checked the back of the toilet to see if I was hiding anything there.”
Now perhaps some might be asking why I would be blogging about a squirrel in New York on the day prior to the election. Well, I live in the total Democrat controlled state of California … totally Democrat just like New York. The governor of California is a Democrat just like the governor of New York, and most appointees are liberal. Now while I do not have any pets, I do pray quietly. If Kamala is elected, certainly the DOJ will continue to be gestapo-like, just like it is now, and I dread the morning that ten armed government agents come without cause to search my house, just like Mark Longo’s!
11/4/24
Dr. Luis Manuel de Jesus
On Sundays I write about individuals who do something special, and deserve our respect and praise.
Today, that person is Dr. Luis Manuel de Jesus, an obstetrician who lives and works in Santo Domingo. The father of three had aspired to be a doctor since he was a child.
There is little doubt that the moment of birth should be a joyous time for both the mother and her newborn.
“Bringing life into this world is a great privilege,”
Dr. Luis Manuel de Jesus told The Epoch Times. “[It’s] very fulfilling for me.”
The 46-year-old doctor works at Centro Médico GRUMED, which belongs to Grupo Médico San Cristóbal, with his wife, Diana Figueroa, who is also an OB-GYN. He has loved singing from a young age, eventually joining a church choir. While studying to become a general doctor at the Autonomous University of Santo Domingo, Dr. de Jesus joined the university choir too.
Later, as he went on to study gynecology, obstetrics, and oncology, Dr. de Jesus found himself with no time to attend rehearsals, but his passion for singing didn’t fade.
One day, while introducing a patient to her newborn for the first time, he decided to sing to the pair in his melodious voice.
“I saw that she was very pleased,” he said, adding that after seeing footage of the moment on social media, other patients asked him to sing at their deliveries, too. Soon, his singing began to regularly permeate the maternity ward.
Knowing how incredibly stressful childbirth can be, Dr. de Jesus now frequently goes the extra mile to support his patients by singing during labor to help them feel “relaxed, calm, and happy.”
Truly Dr. de Jesus is a not only a special obstetrician, but also a special person.
11/3/24
A Personal Spreadsheet
Just the other day I read something about what Dave Ramsey said. Let’s be clear, prior to reading about what he said, I had no idea who Dave Ramsey was. Apparently he is an influential financial radio show personality, and he has a ton of listeners. He basically went about how he decided which Presidential candidate to vote for by making a personal spreadsheet. His line of reasoning was formulated and logical. Essentially the spreadsheet contained a multitude of questions which revolved around “whose policies do I like.” “Which are beneficial to me?”
Questions like:
“Who has a tax policy that I like?”
“Who has a foreign policy that I like?”
“Who has a gun policy that I like?”
“Who has a climate change policy that I like?”
“Who has an immigration policy that I like?”
“Who has a woke policy that I like?”
Etc.
He did not consider the following non-policy issues:
“Who’s a mean tweeter?”
“Who cackles when not answering questions?
“Should I vote for Harris solely because she’s a woman?”
“Should I vote against Harris because she is a woman?”
He then tallied the answers to his policy questions in two columns … the DT column and the KH column.
As a consequence of this very logical way of thinking, Dave Ramsey has decided to vote for Donald Trump.
What about you ?
11/2/24
Rogan 2
Last night I stayed up way past my bedtime and watched “The Joe Rogan Experience.” Different from when Donald Trump was on that same show, I watched the entire thing, which I am guessing was close to three hours. The guest on this show was not Kamala Harris or Tim Walz, but rather J.D. Vance.
For those of you not very familiar with Trump’s running mate, my suggestion is for you to either to read Vance’s basic autobiography, ‘Hillbilly Elegy,’ or to watch Vance speak about a wide variety of subjects on The Joe Rogan Experience on You-Tube.
Admittedly this is only the second time I have watched Rogan’s podcast show, the first being when Donald Trump appeared on that same show about a week or so ago. I think that Vance did well with knowledge on a wide variety of topics. One of the beauties of Rogan’s podcast format is that it allows for open discussion on just about anything.
Rogan and Vance did not agree on everything, and on some topics, e.g. newer PTSD treatments, Rogan knew quite a lot whereas Vance admittedly knew nothing. Keep in mind … no notes, no scheduled questions … a true free-format.
Be that as it may, even though J.D.Vance did quite well, Donald Trump did better. However, what I came away with after three hours or so of watching is that Vance is more than capable of stepping into President Trump’s shoes if something unforeseen were to happen.
Remember:
Neither Harris or Walz appeared on Rogan’s podcast. Harris fell back on the hackneyed “scheduling conflict” trope, and Walz was invisible. Could either of them have appeared with Rogan? … should either of them have appeared on the Joe Rogan Experience.? Only time will tell.
11/1/24