Now to start out I need to be clear. Neither my wife nor myself own an electric vehicle (EV). We have two gas powered cars. Furthermore in spite of Biden’s exorbitant gas prices, we have no plans to buy an EV in the near future. Granted our cars are old, 2000 & 2013, but if either were to bite the dust, like the other 93% of new car purchasers, we would buy another gas powered vehicle. At present, EVs, still only make up about seven percent of all new-vehicle purchases. Why would I not buy an EV? No, it’s not because of the price, as I can afford one. Rather, it’s because, at heart, I am an environmentalist.
I can almost hear the guffaws, and the comments, “Not buying an EV, because of concern for the environment is an oxymoron.”
However, a study recently published by an environmental advocacy group, the Climate +Community Project expresses concern. According to this study’s authors:(Climate and Community Project, Jan 2023):
“A crucial aspect of electrified transportation is new demand for metals, and specifically the most non-replaceable metal for EV batteries– Lithium. If today’s demand for EVs is projected to 2050, the lithium requirements of the US EV market alone in 2050 would require triple the amount of lithium currently produced for the entire global market. This boom in demand could only be met by the expansion of mining.
Large-scale mining entails social and environmental harm, in many cases irreversibly damaging landscapes without the consent of affected communities.”
Destroying the environment by lithium mining is a significant concern according to this environmental advocacy group. Their nonsensical solution to this potential environmental quagmire is … to stop driving automobiles, which is not going to happen.
So, it seems that we have an EV oxymoron in that the building of EVs which are supposedly good for the environment are destroying the environment.
Hmmm!
2/28/23