Posted on by Californiacontrarian

Supreme Court; Should It Be Like Roulette?

As it stands now the makeup of the Supreme Court is pure luck, just like roulette. At present, the past three presidents, Barack Obama, George W.Bush, and Bill Clinton, have each nominated two and President Trump is on the verge of nominating his second Justice. This recent equality as far as presidential Supreme Court nominees, however is pure happenstance.
Here we are in the middle of another mudslinging, downright disgusting process of the approval of a Supreme Court Justice. Why is this process so nasty? Why do some senators go out of their way to insult and belittle the nominee? Why do some even go so far as to insult the religious faith of the nominee? Is this just politics as usual? Of course the thinly veiled attacks on the nominee’s reputation do play well with the senator’s base, but is that all that is behind it? No, obviously not, as the nomination and the subsequent vote to accept the nominee has dramatic effects for decades to come because the appointment to Supreme Court is a lifetime appointment. Other than judges are there any other lifetime positions? If there are please let me know. Other than retiring like Justice Kennedy recently did, the Supreme Court is a lifetime position, and so the political stakes are exceptionally high . . . perhaps too high!
Why does this have to be a lifetime appointment? The answer is that’s what’s in the Constitution. That’s what the designers figured would keep the justices free from political pressures for if they didn’t have to worry about their future, they would more likely be fair and just in their decisions. But that was then and this is now! There is one major difference between the 1770s and 2018. Life expectancy! In the latter part of the 18th century, the average life expectancy was 36 years, and in the early 1800s it rose to 37 years. That is far cry from today’s life expectancy. In 2007, the average life expectancy at birth for persons born in the United States was 77.9 years, an increase of 1.1 years from 2000 and an increase of 0.2 years from 2006, and by 2050 the average life expectancy is predicted to increase to 80 for men, and 83-85 for women.

In 1790 the average age of a Supreme Court Justice at retirement was about 62 years, whereas in 2010 it was about 77 years. Call me crazy, but I doubt that this is what the framers of the Constitution envisioned.
Personally, I think that Kennedy’s decision to retire was the right decision. After all he was 81 years old! Since there is no mandatory retirement age, there have been
justices that did not retire till 90! Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is now 85 years old – four years than older Kennedy, and five years past the average retirement age.
Personally, if I have a case going before the highest court in the land, I do not want a bunch of octogenarians deciding it, and that is why I am recommending the following “rotating mandatory retirement” for Supreme Court justices. I propose that one year and three years after each presidential election, the justice that has been on the Court the longest would be forced to retire.Since there are nine Supreme Court justices, each would serve as a Supreme Court Justice for an average of 18 years, and I think that is plenty long.
Let’s use Justice Ginsberg as an example. She took her seat on the Supreme Court in August 1993 after a nomination from Bill Clinton, and her present the tenure is three years shorter than the average tenure. With my plan, she would have retired in 2011, and Justice Kennedy who was appointed in 1987 would have retired in 2005.
There are two caveats to this plan. No single president could appoint more than three justices. If a president was elected for two terms (8 years in office), he would appoint only three justices – one at the end of the first and third year of his first term, and one at the end of his third year of his second term. Likewise if a justice died, the president would then have to nominate a new justice, even though it was not on the usual two year-four year cycle, but again each president could only nominate a total of three justices maximum. The bickering about Justice Scalia’s replacement would have been avoided since according to this plan, then President Obama would have already nominated his three justices, and so he would have maxed out.This plan would also avoid picking Supreme Court nominees based on age, as all would serve 18 years.  Before his decision, President Trump’s three leading potential nominees were all around 50, and so they could realistically serve for approximately 30 years as a Supreme Court Justice. That’s too long!

222 Replies to “Supreme Court; Should It Be Like Roulette?”

  80. Greetings I am so glad I found your blog page, I really
    found you by accident, while I was browsing on Aol for something else, Anyways I am
    here now and would just like to say thanks for a incredible
    post and a all round enjoyable blog (I also love the
    theme/design), I don’t have time to go through it all at the minute but I have book-marked
    it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more,
    Please do keep up the awesome job. https://ibs3457.com/question/how-to-apply-for-a-loan-online-2/

  83. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish.
    nonetheless, you command get bought an nervousness over that you wish be
    delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the
    same nearly a lot often inside case you shield this increase. https://Strongprisonwivesandfamilies.com/question/intensive-program-mental-health-quebec/

  136. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually
    something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me.

    I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it! https://sugardaddyschile.cl/question/comment-se-debarrasser-vos-verrues-du-pied-en-utilisant-des-methodes-de-brulure/

  155. Hello I am so glad I found your webpage, I really found you
    by error, while I was looking on Bing for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like
    to say thanks a lot for a remarkable post and a all round exciting blog (I also
    love the theme/design), I don’t have time to browse it all at the
    minute but I have bookmarked it and also added your RSS feeds, so
    when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the
    excellent jo. https://www.myad.live/user/profile/7588

  161. First off I would like to say terrific blog!

    I had a quick question which I’d like to ask if you don’t mind.
    I was curious to find out how you center yourself and clear your mind
    before writing. I’ve had a hard time clearing my thoughts in getting my thoughts out.
    I do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the
    first 10 to 15 minutes tend to be wasted simply just trying to figure
    out how to begin. Any recommendations or hints?
    Thanks! https://Cafreeclassifieds.com/author/roseannburw/

  165. I have been browsing online more than 3 hours lately, but I never
    found any interesting article like yours. It is lovely worth sufficient
    for me. In my view, if all website owners and bloggers made just
    right content material as you did, the internet might
    be a lot more helpful than ever before. https://Cl-System.jp/question/9-0-liste-des-prestations-des-equipements-et-fournitures-de-soins-personnels/

  177. Excellent items from you, man. I have bear in mind
    your stuff prior to and you are just too magnificent. I really like what you’ve obtained right here, really like
    what you’re saying and the best way by which you are saying it.

    You make it entertaining and you continue to care for to stay it wise.
    I can not wait to learn far more from you.
    That is really a tremendous web site. https://Kizkiuz.com/user/VDTCarmine/

  185. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish.

    nonetheless, you command get bought an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following.

    unwell unquestionably come further formerly again since exactly the same nearly a lot often inside case you shield
    this increase. https://vknigah.com/user/AlexandriaBirnie/

  188. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The text in your content seem to be running off the screen in Safari.
    I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with web browser compatibility
    but I thought I’d post to let you know. The design look great though!

    Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Thanks https://WWW.Purros.com/what-are-the-advantages-of-special-purpose-machine-compared-to-machining-centers/

  191. Good day I am so glad I found your site, I really found you by mistake, while I was browsing on Google for something
    else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say thank you for
    a fantastic post and a all round interesting blog (I also
    love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the
    moment but I have saved it and also added in your RSS
    feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please
    do keep up the fantastic job. http://Idesys.Co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=39141

  194. Good day! I know this is kinda off topic however I’d figured I’d ask.
    Would you be interested in exchanging links or maybe guest authoring a
    blog post or vice-versa? My blog discusses a lot of the same topics as yours and I
    think we could greatly benefit from each other. If you might be
    interested feel free to shoot me an email. I look forward to hearing
    from you! Excellent blog by the way! https://365.expresso.blog/question/emsculpt-avant-et-apres-transformation-corporelle-revolutionnaire-14/

  209. I have been browsing online greater than 3 hours lately,
    but I by no means found any interesting article like yours.
    It’s pretty value sufficient for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made excellent content as you did, the internet will
    probably be a lot more helpful than ever before.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.