Natural Immunity ? “Err … No Idea!”

I just read an interesting thing concerning Covid from Townhall:

“Law firm Siri & Glimstad, through a Freedom of Information Act request, wanted to see from the CDC: “Documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID-19 vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID-19 once, recovered, and then later become infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.” 

In response, the CDC stated, “A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. The CDC Emergency Operations Centers (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.” 

Incredible! Amazing! Outlandish! Ridiculous! Absurd! 

The central tenant of a substantial number of anti-vaxers is that because they have already had a documented case of Covid, they have antibodies and thus do not need to get the vaccine. One might ask, “What does the science say?” When the answer from those who should know (the CDC) is “we have no idea!” … that certainly is suspicious. Why wasn’t this issue studied from the git-go?

To me there are only two possibilities:

First: Perhaps those who should know about viral immunity in general actually suggested that natural immunity should be assumed to be the real deal. The CDC then ignored that recommendation, and decided to go with the “if we do not look, we can say that we do not know” strategy.

Second: Could it be that if natural immunity was never considered to be valid, then how much easier would it be to carry out mandatory vaccinations. If natural immunity should ever be considered to be as good  as or better than the vaccines, wouldn’t almost all “anti-vaxers” then simply claim to already have had Covid. Certainly the government could not handle this sort of reasonable dissent. The fact that the CDC has not studied this is incredible, amazing, outlandish, ridiculous, and absurd, and makes me wonder what they are trying to hide.

11/16/21

www.californiacontrarian.com

131 Replies to “Natural Immunity ? “Err … No Idea!””

  1. Nearly all of the things you assert happens to be supprisingly precise and that makes me wonder the reason why I had not looked at this in this light previously. This particular piece truly did turn the light on for me as far as this particular subject goes. But at this time there is one point I am not really too comfy with so while I attempt to reconcile that with the actual central theme of your point, allow me see exactly what the rest of your readers have to say.Very well done.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.