Category: Uncategorized

Earlier this month, a BLM rioter was sentenced to ten years in federal prison for burning down a Minneapolis pawn shop during the George Floyd riots in May 2020. Without knowing any of the details, one might say, “Okay, justice was done,” but that comment would be without knowing the rest of the story.

From PJMedia:

“Sentencing guidelines, however, recommended a sentence of nearly double that. It turns out that Joe Biden’s Justice Department recommended a lesser sentence because the rioter, Montez Terriel Lee Jr., of Rochester, New York, committed his crime in the name of Black Lives Matter.

According to a memo from the U.S. Attorney’s office for the District of Minnesota, even though Lee ‘committed a crime that cost a man his life,’ his motives for committing the crime merited a lesser sentence.”

Reread that last statement and understand that it implies that the Federal legal system, at least in Minnesota is openly saying that if you did something in the name of BLM, that you merit a reduced sentence. Granted that is audacious enough, but it gets worse!

“Because supporting Black Lives Matter is apparently the key to a reduced sentence in Joe Biden’s Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney’s office requested Lee get 144 months instead of the recommended 235-240 months. Instead, the Obama-nominated Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright sentenced Lee to 120 months.”

So to be clear, the Biden Justice Department recommended a marked reduction in Mr. Lee’s sentence (because of BLM), but not to be outdone, Judge Wright further reduced his sentence by another two years.

Even though I know that Justice is supposed to be blind, would anybody like to take a guess on the gender and skin color of Judge Wright? Is it possible that this Yale (BA) and Harvard (JD) graduate is, for all intents and purposes, auditioning for a Biden nomination to the Supreme Court?

2/3/22

El Salvador is another in the list of countries that have had beneficial results as far as Covid is concerned. On a cumulative basis El Salvador has done exceptionally well in terms of Covid mortality.

A lot of what follows is taken from JoNova (A science presenter, writer, speaker & former TV host; author of The Skeptic’s Handbook (over 200,000 copies distributed & available in 15 languages).

In terms of total death rates per million from Covid — El Salvador at 587 per million is worse than New Zealand (10) and Australia(95)  but lower than Canada (820), the UK (2,200), and the US (2,500).

How can it be that El Salvador had a death rate of about 20-25% that of the US?

It’s fair to ask if El Salvador has done enough testing, but the test positivity rate varied from 3% – 15% which is on par with many countries. 

As early as July 2020 El Salvador was trialling kits to treat Covid that included Ivermectin. Cases were starting to rise, so on August 9, 2020 the President Nayib Bukele made a national announcement that treatment kits and tests were available. Anyone with symptoms could call up the helpline and a box would be delivered to their home. Subsequently the Covid rate dramatically dropped.

The treatment kits included ivermectin, azithromycin, zinc, Vitamin D, Panadol, and an antihistamine … in the following doses:

        Acetaminophen 500 MG 1 Tab VO C /6 hours

• Loratadine 10 MG 1 Tab V C /12 hours
• Zinc 50 MG 1 Tab VO / day
• Ivermectin 6 MG 1 Tab VO C /12 day
• Vitamin C 500 MG 1 Tab VO C /day
• Vitamin D 2000 MG 1 Tab VO C /day
• Azithromycin 1 Tab VO C/day

By January 2021 cases were on the rise again and so Ivermectin was made available over the counter without a prescription for anyone to buy at pharmacies. Similar to what happened that prior summer, the Covid rates dropped impressively. Was it the vaccine that caused this second drop? … No, as the vaccine rollout began in February 2021, and by April 9 only 2.8% of the population was vaccinated. 

Why is Ivermectin not more widely used to treat Covid? 

Is it safe?

Back in 2010 some 700 children were enrolled in a trial to control head lice in two schools in Canberra, Australia. The most lice infected school not only gave ivermectin doses to 93% of all the children, but sent the drug home for their brothers and sisters too.  The exact details are behind a paywall, but similar trials like this use oral doses of 200 micrograms per kilogram, which is, as it happens, the same dose the FLCCC recommends for adults to use for prevention against Covid.

At the end of the school trial, six months later, lice infestations were down by 87% and “No adverse events were reported. ”

Read that last line again.

Lucky El Salvador didn’t wait for the random controlled trials to develop a treatment kit.

2/2/22

Isn’t it about time that someone addressed the topic of “vaccine safety?”

From Blazemedia:

The pro-pharma politicians and media claim the CDC’s pharmacosurveillance tool “VAERS” (Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System) is not good enough to trigger investigations into the shots because anyone can supposedly submit a vaccine adverse event entry. Thus, all the concerning safety signals from VAERS are being ignored, even though that system was put in place as a consolation to the public for absolving vaccine manufacturers of liability. Well, now some military whistleblowers are coming forward to present data that, if verified, would signal extremely disturbing safety concerns about the vaccine that make the VAERS data look like child’s play.

On 1/24/22, during Sen. Ron Johnson’s five-hour hearing on a “COVID-19: Second Opinion,” Ohio attorney Thomas Renz, who has been representing clients suing the vaccine mandates, presented DOD medical billing data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) that paints a shockingly disturbing picture of the health of our service members in 2021.

According to the military, DMED is the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch’s (AFHSB) contains every ICD medical billing code for any medical diagnosis in the military submitted for medical insurance billing during any given period of time. Three military doctors have presented queried data to Renz that shows a shocking and sudden spike in nearly every ICD code for common vaccine injuries in 2021.

In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long — three military doctors — revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average.

Rent said that the numbers tended to be remarkably similar in all those preceding years, including in 2020, which was the first year of the pandemic but before the vaccines were distributed. But then in 2021, the numbers skyrocketed, and the 2021 data doesn’t even include the months of November and December. 

Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!

Some other numbers that he did not mention at the hearing but gave in an interview are the following:

• myocardial infarction –269% increase
• Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
• congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
• female infertility – 471% increase
• pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase

Sworn declarations from one of the military doctors, state as follows, “It is my professional opinion that the major increased incidences of the above discussed instances of miscarriages, cancers, and disease were due to COVID-19 ‘vaccinations.'”

Ask yourself …”what possible benefits are to be gained by these military MDs reporting what they think is the truth?” … None!

Also ask yourself what possible benefit accrues for Dr. Peter McCullough (see Part 1), when he reports on all of these vaccine side effects … None!

2/1/22

As I have done a few times in the past when the amount of material on a topic is voluminous, I am going to divide this long essay on vaccine safety into two parts. These two parts compliment each other even though the information is taken from things that are six months apart and are taken from sources that are not related in any way.

Today’s initial part is taken from an interview with Dr. Peter McCullogh, who is a world renown Covid authority. His credentials are far far more than I have the space for … Google him! Back in July, 2021 Dr. McCullough gave an unedited one hour interview on Brannon House Live. In this interview Dr. McCullogh goes over just about everything one could desire to know about the coronavirus with emphasis on the spike protein. In this essay, I am going to focus on what he had to say about vaccine safety … and he had quite a lot to say about vaccine safety. 

(From the very beginning I need to state clearly that I am not an anti-vaxer. In fact I received the standard two doses of Moderna way back last winter, and about a month ago, I received the Moderna booster.)

To start with from the time of the vaccine’s initial availability, Dr. McCullough was very straightforward in expressing his disagreement with vaccinating everybody. In general, he felt that seniors and those who cared for them should receive the vaccine. His reasoning had to do with the higher the percent of the population vaccinated, the higher the chance that different virus mutations would be produced. He further felt, and still feels very strongly that those who are under fifty years old without certain health conditions should have never received the vaccine.

Fast forward to Dr. McCullogh’s main points of emphasis concerning vaccine safety and vaccine caused deaths. The CDC had confirmed 10,000 vaccine caused deaths (recall that his interview and thus the CDC’s figures were back from last July.) … 50% in the first 48 hours after the vaccine and 80% in the first week with 86% of the deaths having no other explanation.

The longer term side effects from the vaccine are primarily in four organ systems, including neurologic, the heart, the immune system, and blood clotting. These side effects will continue to mount, and may never resolve.  He is repulsed that the CDC and the FDA are not publishing updated monthly numbers on side effects. He has quite a lot to say about pregnant woman receiving the vaccine … “NEVER!” Likewise he feels strongly about the advisability of those college aged and younger receiving the vaccine … “No! A thousand times no!”

Again because of space constraints, I cannot include much of what Dr. McCullough has to say. For those who are interested, he has a website – 

Americaoutloud.com.

State tuned for Part 2 on vaccine safety tomorrow.

1/31/22

As is now my Sunday custom, today’s piece is devoted to someone who is deserving of our respect.

From Blaze media:

Joe Kennedy, who started coaching in 2008, exercised his faith by silently offering a brief prayer to God at midfield immediately after football games. According to his lawyers, Kennedy would simply drop to one knee and “offer a silent or quiet prayer of thanksgiving for player safety, sportsmanship, and spirited competition.”

The tradition went on for years without any complaints and, in fact, was embraced by members of the community and players, who often joined him. Then suddenly, in 2015, the school district ordered Kennedy to stop, arguing his practice violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. When he refused, the district terminated him.

Bremerton School District’s decision in 2015 to fire Joe Kennedy — a Christian and 20-year Marine veteran who served as a high school assistant football coach in the district — drew national headlines and enraged religious liberty advocates.

Twice the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against him.

This time around, First Liberty argued that Kennedy’s case involves more than just a high school football coach’s ability to express his religious views. Rather, it has far more wide-ranging implications for “practically everything public school teachers [do] or say during school hours or after-school hours.”

In an op-ed published by Fox News last year, Kennedy defended his ongoing legal fight, saying, “There are days when I want to give up and move on with my life. There are days when I don’t think I can keep fighting this fight. But that’s when I remember the hundreds of times I told my players not to quit no matter the challenge!”

“I also think of the thousands of other public school coaches and teachers whose inalienable right to freely exercise their faith in public is at risk if the court decisions against me are allowed to stand,” he added.

From the pseudo-announcer in the press box:

“It’s fourth and one with time running out. In a nationally televised game, Coach Kennedy decides to go for it. The crowd is roaring it’s approval. The entire nation is applauding his gumption and courage.”

1/30/22

President Joe Biden and his crack team in the White House have introduced a new term into the political vernacular … “scheduling conflicts.” I first noticed this term a few weeks ago when Stacey Abrams could not meet with Biden in Georgia because of “scheduling conflicts.” Okay, okay, even though we are all used to politicians “fibbing” now and then, did those responsible for Stacy Abrams schedule actually think that anyone would buy that feeble excuse? More important, did Stacey Abrams think that that excuse would pass the sniff test? Realistically I guess it’s possible that there was an actual good reason that Ms. Abrams just could not make it on the day that Biden visited … for instance, perhaps she was going to have open-heart surgery that day, and it could not be rescheduled! Even though I did not read anything about her heart surgery, perhaps Ms. Abrams preferred to keep her health issues private … and that I can understand.

Coincidentally, when President Biden was scheduled to visit Pittsburgh on 1/28/22, there were more “scheduling conflicts.” Two of Pennsylvania’s top Democrats, Josh Fetterman, the state’s lieutenant governor, who is running for Senate, and gubernatorial candidate Josh Shapiro, the state’s attorney general, missed  the president’s visit because of “scheduling conflicts.” I suppose there could have been two more politicians scheduled to have open-heart surgery on the same day, and by pure happenstance, that day just happened to be the day that President Biden was visiting Pittsburgh. Hmmm!

BTW, if you think that actual “scheduling conflicts” were involved in any of these snubs, I have a bridge to sell you!

1/29/22

Most Americans with a modicum of intelligence realize that the presidency of Joe Biden has been … I’m trying to think of descriptive PG-rated term … okay, let’s go with a ‘disaster,’ and a disaster on just about all counts. Starting on the first day of his presidency with the shutting down of the Keystone Pipeline and the resultant spike in gas prices, just about everything that he gets involved with, turns to sh**. The border is a mess. His pullout from Afghanistan was incredibly inept, and it certified him as an inexperienced rookie as far as foreign policy was concerned.

Now he is engaged in a mano-a-mano exchange with Russia’s Putin over Ukraine. Who do you think is the favorite in this matchup? … Duh! 

Now to me this whole situation is scary, but not in a way that most are thinking. Follow me with this:

Biden’s favorability numbers are horrible and going downhill fast. The midterms are rapidly approaching, and the Democrats are in need of a life-preserver of some sort to distract the country away from Biden’s record. In the past what has been the best way to unite the country behind a President?  … and that’s what scares me! … as desperate people can oftentimes do really stupid things when they feel themselves going downhill fast.

1/28/22

I just read the results of a recent Rasmussen Poll, and was shocked when I read about some of the drastic measures that some people want to take concerning the unvaccinated. I thought, “What totalitarian country am I living in?”

I am perplexed as whether the mindset of some of those who would back  these drastic measures has been there all along, or if these totalitarian opinions were somehow related to Covid. When I say ‘related to Covid,’ I do not mean caused directly by the virus, but rather caused by the over-the-top panic porn that Covid has indirectly caused.

To start, let’s go over some of the findings in this poll of 1016 Likely Voters taken on 1/5/22:

Biden’s vaccine mandates on large corporations – 48% for, and 48% against.

Dr. Fauci – favorable view = 45%; unfavorable view = 48%.

A monetary fine for Americans who choose not to get the vaccine? Democrats -55% support; Republicans -19% support; unaffiliated -25% support.

Quarantine unvaccinated to their homes at all times except for emergencies? Democrats -59% approve; Republicans – 21% approve; unaffiliated -29% approve.

Putting unvaccinated in designated facilities? Democrats – 45% approval;  Republicans – 78% strongly disapprove; unaffiliated – 64% strongly disapprove.

Temporarily removing children from the custody of unvaccinated parents! 

Democrats – 29% support! Republicans – 7% support; unaffiliated -11% support.

I understand the close to 50/50 split between the vaccine mandates and Fauci, as the country is split close to 50/50 politically. Interestingly, for the most part the unaffiliated side up with the Republicans. Hoeever, what I am flabbergasted by and do not understand is the vindictiveness of the Democrats. 

President Biden’s strongest supporters are most likely to endorse the harshest punishments against those who won’t get the COVID-19 vaccine. Among voters who have a Very Favorable impression of Biden, 51% are in favor of government putting the unvaccinated in “designated facilities,” and 54% favor imposing fines or prison sentences on vaccine critics. By contrast, among voters who have a Very Unfavorable view of Biden, 95% are against “designated facilities” for the unvaccinated and 93% are against criminal punishment for vaccine critics.

Have the Democrats always been this vindictive? Is this a reflection of the vindictive personality of their leader, Joe Biden, or are Democrats vindictive by nature? I have my opinion on their “my way or the highway” mentality … what’s yours?

1/27/22

“Democrats Warn That Republicans Plan To Steal Election By Blocking Democrat Efforts To Steal Election”

Granted that headline was from the satirical Babylon Bee, but think about it for just a minute.

As Joseph Stalin said, “I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how.”

This past week another Joe said something very similar in a shocking statement that could easily be attributed to a third world dictator. When asked about election legislation this week, the president of the United States of America said that it’s not who can vote, but who gets to count the vote. Who counts the vote—that’s what this is about.

To me one Joe sounds a lot like the other Joe!

From Townhall:

What President Biden really thinks is that the Feds should take over elections, stripping states of their election responsibilities as designated by the U.S. Constitution.  The Dems want to control who counts the votes. Democrats want the federal government to have complete control over the election process and many haven’t tried to hide the fact that they think this is the only way they can win in 2022 and beyond. 

The Dems are seeking to institutionalize and nationalize every change they made to elections under the guise of protecting people from COVID. Eradicating voter identification … Weakening absentee ballot protections, and making it easier for fraudsters to steal ballots from vulnerable voters.

The Left has broadcast their plans to: eradicate voter identification, end signature matching on absentee ballots, allow strangers to collect and turn in ballots, place ballot boxes in unsecure locations, and mass mail ballots to people who did not request them. And if all of that doesn’t get them the win, they are ready to make sure that unelected federal bureaucrats upend state election integrity laws and determine who counts the ballots where you live. 

The scary thing is that one thinks about it, the headline from the Babylon Bee is really not too far off from reality:

“Democrats Warn That Republicans Plan To Steal Election By Blocking Democrat Efforts To Steal Election”

1/26/22

The Pacific island nation of Kiribati, which had almost entirely kept the coronavirus out, went into lockdown on 1/22/22 for the first time in the pandemic. The government imposed a 24-hour curfew after passengers on the first international flight in months tested positive for the virus.

Before this month, the island, one of the world’s most remote, had recorded just two infections – in two people returning on a ship in May last year, who quarantined on the vessel.

So you might be asking, “Where is Kiribati?” and “Who cares!”

First … “Where is Kiribati?”

Kiribati, officially the Republic of Kiribati, is an independent island nation in the central Pacific Ocean. The permanent population is over 119,000, more than half of whom live on Tarawa atoll. The state comprises 32 atolls and one raised coral island, Banaba. Kiribati sits in the middle of the South Pacific between Hawaii and New Zealand.

Thirty-six people on a flight from Fiji tested positive on landing about a week ago on the first plane to arrive since the nation reopened its borders this month. All 54 passengers were quarantined at a facility, but at least four cases were since reported in the community, including a security guard at the quarantine center.

Second … “Who cares?”

I find the Kiribati situation interesting because it points out that isolation where possible, as on an isolated island nation, only works for so long.

A similar situation is occurring in American Samoa, which detected its first infection only in September, also announced a full lockdown for 48 hours starting Saturday after an uptick of 15 coronavirus cases that arrived on a flight from Australia.

And speaking of Australia which was in an over the top “lockdown-a-go-go” is now being overwhelmed by Omicron.

What Kiribati, American Samoa, and Australia have in common other than being island nations, is that they all have high vaccination rates, and so one would expect mild although prolific disease with Omicron.

Irrespective of how long and how stringent one’s lockdown policies are, it’s only a matter of time before Covid breaks through.

1/25/22