A Call To Action

Jurupa Valley is a city of about 100,000 in Riverside County, California. It

is home to the Jurupa Unified School District. This  district operates 16 elementary schools, four middle schools, three continuation schools, and four high schools. 

Apparently those in charge of the Jurupa Unified School District have some unusual ideas about who is actually paying their salaries via taxes.

The district’s policies require teachers to conceal students’ gender transitions from parents … those same parents who are ultimately responsible not only for paying these teacher’s salaries, but are also ultimately responsible for these school kids. 

If a kid gets taken to the police station because of some mischief, who do the police call?  Hint: Not ghostbusters, and not the teachers. They call the parents. If a school kid is hungry on the weekend, who is responsible for feeding that child?  Hint: Neither the teachers nor the school principals. If the school-aged child wants to play a sport, who is responsible for all of the fees that go along with playing that sport?  Hint: Not the school district. And if that same child has a soccer game, or a baseball game on the weekend, raise your hand if you think that someone who works for the school district will provide the necessary transportation.  Hint: Those that work for the school district are off on the weekend, and furthermore, no one raised their hand!

So why is the school district, the school principal, and the school teachers in the Jurupa Balley School District responsible for concealing the student’s gender confusion and gender identity from the parents. Who gave them this authority?  Hint: I am thinking that it’s the devil that is making them do it (for as long as the devil is to blame, no one actually takes responsibility.)

From BlazeNews:

Jessica Tapia, a former physical education teacher who worked at the Jurupa Unified School District in Jurupa Valley, California, informed the district that because of her religious beliefs, she would not be able to lie or withhold information regarding the wellbeing of children from their parents.

The teacher explained that the school required her to refer to students by their preferred pronouns and withhold that information from their parents. She was also told to allow transgender students into the locker room that coincides with their chosen gender identity.

Tapia said the district told her that it would be discriminatory against transgender students not to allow biological boys into the female locker room.

Tapia stated that, according to the school district, students have a right to privacy, even from their parents.

“If a student shares information regarding a pronoun preference or thinking they’re maybe the opposite gender of what they biologically are, if they share that information with a teacher, we are supposed to keep that info from parents in case the parent doesn’t know,” she explained.

Tapia stated that, according to the school district, students have a right to privacy, even from their parents.

“If a student shares information regarding a pronoun preference or thinking they’re maybe the opposite gender of what they biologically are, if they share that information with a teacher, we are supposed to keep that info from parents in case the parent doesn’t know,” she explained.

Ms. Tapia refused to lie to the parents, and refused to give in to these outrageous school district demands based on her religious views.

Tapia received a letter signed by the assistant superintendent of human resources, Daniel Brooks, informing her that the district would be unable to accommodate her religious exception request and that she would be dismissed from her position on January 31.

“Based on your religious beliefs, you cannot be dishonest with parents … If asked about a student’s gender identity by a parent, you cannot refer the parent to a counselor, defer the inquiry and suggest they speak with a student …, or otherwise deflect the parent’s inquiry,” the letter stated.

“The district cannot accommodate your religious beliefs that … prohibit you from maintaining a student’s gender identity and refraining from disclosing a student’s gender identity from his/her/their parent(s)/guardians,” the letter continued.

Now let’s be clear here. I do not know what Ms. Tapia’s religion is nor do I know her religious beliefs. However, if I had a child in the Jurupa Valley School District, and this skullduggery and deceit were happening in reference to my child, the Jurupa Valley School District would not have anywhere near the money to pay the settlement from my lawsuit, and neither would the woke assistant superintendent of Human Resources, Daniel Brooks.  Furthermore, I am issuing a call to action to all the parents of school-aged children in the Jurupa Valley School District to do the same!

BTW: Tapia told a news outlet that she plans to take legal action against the district.

“You go, girl!”

4/12/23