Coming Soon To a Theater Near You

A few years back my wife and I traveled to New Zealand. I found the country to be quite beautiful, but what I remember the most was how nice and how polite the New Zealanders were. However in contrast as many of you may recall, New Zealanders had a devil of a time during Covid with overbearing authoritarian mandates and leadership. (The ‘we know best’ crowd was in charge.) Well now even though Covid is for the most part over, apparently authoritarianism is still alive and well in New Zealand. 

As best I understand the situation involves a six month old baby that needs non-emergent heart surgery. 

While the open-heart surgery is said to be lifesaving, the father stated, “We don’t want blood that is tainted by vaccination.”

“We’re fine with anything else doctors want to do,” said the parent of the baby.

Okay, I get it. If someone … anyone, has chosen not to receive a Covid vaccination, so be it, as it is his/her own choice. From my point of view, it doesn’t matter what the reason is, as one should be able to control what goes into their own body. Likewise, if parents choose not to have their children receive the Covid vaccine, I feel that similarly it is their choice. One of the questions in this New Zealand situation, is whether or not the parents have the right to demand that their six month old not receive any blood from a vaccinated donor. 

Is anybody certain that there will not be any long term adverse consequences from this new mRNA vaccine? Obviously the answer is, “no, no one can be certain.” Likewise can anyone be certain that there will not be any long term adverse consequences from receiving blood from a vaccinated individual? Obviously, the answer again is, “no, no one can be certain.”

To me, the solution here is quite simple. Use “donor-specific blood. Here in the U.S., for a small fee, one can request that “donor-specific blood” be collected and saved to be used specifically for a certain individual.

(Blood is donated by X, to be used specifically for Y.) If Y requires a blood transfusion, then the collected “donor-specific blood will be preferentially be used. If Y does not need the collected “donor-specific blood,” then after a relatively short period of time, that blood is released for use in the general population. It is not wasted.

As New Zealand is not a medical wasteland, the solution is quite simple … use donor specific blood. However what do you think is happening in New Zealand? 

According to BlazeMedia:

“New Zealand health officials take custody of baby whose parents refused ‘vaccinated blood’ transfusion.”

This despite the fact that the parents have already found hundreds citizens with non-mRNA vaccinated blood, who are ready and willing to donate blood to be used, if needed, by the six month old during his upcoming surgery. 

“Outlandish!” you say. “Could never happen here.”

My warning: “Be very careful, America, as this movie could be coming soon to a theater near you!”

12/12/22