Posted on by Californiacontrarian

Election Influences: Subtle, Criminal, and Beyond


Now three months after the election it seems to me that there were at least four different manipulations, seemingly occurring independently of each other, that combined to steal the victory from Trump.

Some of these were subtle. Some not so subtle. Some merely disingenuous. Some outright criminal.

First:

Subtly, starting well before Election Day the Main Stream Media was using its full force to almost constantly berate President Trump. Granted Mr. Trump was at times an easy target because of his obstreperous and boisterous personality, but his coverage both on TV news and in the Mainstream print was overwhelmingly negative coverage. Note that this is opposed to fawning coverage being given to the milquetoast that now sits in the Oval Office. (“Hand in your questions ahead of time so that they can be screened” . . . OMG!) To my way of thinking even Fox News subtly caved; so much so that I no longer watch the Fox News channel. The recent taking of Lou Dobbs off the air (Fox Business) only goes to prove their leftward slide. In general this MSM influence was certainly subtle, probably purposely so, but not criminal.

Second:

The influence of Big Tech, including Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Amazon, etc. who exerted major influence before and after the election. Starting with the censoring of the New York Post (NYP) in October when the NYP published its blockbuster stories on Biden family corruption . . . not subtle.

In January, the censorship and eventual banning from the Web of President Trump by every major Silicon Valley tech company . . . also not subtle. And finally, most recently, the coordinated takedown of the upstart social media site Parler . . . again, not subtle.

Taken together this Big Tech influence was far from subtle, and possibly criminal.

Third:

The brazen and often very open cheating that occurred all the way down to the precinct level with double and triple counting of some votes, as well as the locking out of Republican observers during the middle of the night when the Biden surge appeared. Also apparently there were a massive number of ballots trucked in from who knows where as well as duffel bags of Biden votes brought in the trunks of cars . . . again from who knows where. Illegals voting. Underage people voting. Dead people voting. Felons voting. Out of state residents voting. Etc Some subtle, some not so subtle, but all criminal.

Fourth:

The recently accumulated data put together by Mike Lindell of My Pillow fame that convincingly documents election interference that goes beyond criminal. Here I am speaking of hacking and cyber crime. carried out by cyber criminals on computers from outside the US – predominately from China. Subtle, and more than just criminal. These manipulations were the equivalent of “cyber warfare.” I watched Lindell’s two hour long video that in my view substantiated cyber interference in vote counting and the vote tabulations in multiple states. (FYI: This video is long, but . . . Wow!)

I can pretty much guarantee that you will not read about his report in the print “newspapers,” and you will not hear about it on visual MSM like national news or Big Tech, venues, like Facebook or YouTube, etc. 

127 Replies to “Election Influences: Subtle, Criminal, and Beyond”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.